1986 >> June >> Bell Laboratories Record March 1930 Vol8 No7  

Bell Laboratories Record - March 1930 Vol.8 No.7
by Ludwell Sibley - Flemington, New Jersey

Reprinted from "Crown Jewels of the Wire", June 1986, page 32

In the days when a couple of million miles of telephone and telegraph circuits were carried on open-wire lines in the U.S., the Bell companies had a strong interest in improved designs for insulators. For example, a telephone call from New York to San Francisco in 1920 went through wires supported on, at the usual figure of 40 poles per mile, about 134,900 pairs of insulators. The tiny electrical leakages occurring in one pair could be magnified by sheer force of numbers into a significant problem. So it was natural that Bell Telephone Laboratories would concern itself with development of communications insulators.

An interesting description of the "state of the art" fifty-plus years ago is in the following article, "Telephone Lines Insulators" by C.D. Hocker in the March, 1930 issue of the Bell Laboratories Record. It summarizes the results of a 32-page, painstakingly technical investigation of insulator designs published as "A Study of Telephone Line Insulators" by L.T. Wilson in the October, 1930 edition of the Bell System Technical Journal. The Wilson article reports the results of tests on what we would recognize as the "toll" (CD 121), "double petticoat (CD 154), "CW" (CD 122.4), and "CS" (CD 128) insulators, plus some experimental types. One of these is the mushroom-shaped item in the drawing (Fig. 1) A photograph (Fig. 2) in the May, 1936 Bell Laboratories Record shows a test rack on a rooftop holding better than 60 of these experimental insulators, covered with ice and undergoing evaluation.


Fig. 1


Fig. 2 - Artificial sleet formation on an insulator test rack


Telephone Line Insulators

By C. D. HOCKER
Outside Plant Development

The telephone plant requires of an insulator much more than merely that it hold the line wire up off the crossarm. Many of these requirements are common to all insulators. But precisely what is required of any one in particular varies to some extent with the circuit served and the plant associated. An insulator well adapted to one job may be far less so to another. Properties important to its function belong not only to constituent materials, but to design and method of mounting. Thus the development* of insulators must concern itself with the improvement of their general and basic properties and with their refined adaptation to special purposes.

[* The science of insulator materials and designs discussed in this article has been developed over a period of many years. Engineers of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company have been responsible for much of the advance in the field of carrier-current insulators.]

Preeminently an insulator is asked to insulate. In service it should occasion no more loss in signaling power than is warranted in the circuit it serves. In the case of direct current, and low-frequency alternating current signaling circuits, the sum of all the transmission losses occurring in the insulators, pins, and crossarms is small compared with the losses due to the resistance of the line wires themselves. An insulator used in such a circuit has chiefly to obviate undue losses of power by leakage over its surface, through the mounting pin and crossarm and thus to the insulator paired with it. This surface leakage is kept small, by proper choice of both the design and material of the insulators. The most important design feature is the provision of a suitable petticoat which will preserve a well protected dry path. The petticoat may be a double one when a particularly long dry path is needed. The choice of material for making the insulators is important in maintaining low surface leakage. A transparent material is best for telephone line insulators because the ingress of light discourages insects from building, under the insulator petticoat, nests which increase the conductivity of the dry path. Thus porcelain insulators, which may be very good when new, deteriorate in service much more rapidly than glass, because of this bothersome habit of the insects.

To meet the needs of the telephone plant for insulators on non-carrier-current circuits, the insulators which are chiefly used are: exchange insulators, employed on subscribers' loops and other non-toll circuits; toll line insulators, used on the shorter toll lines; and DP (double petticoat) insulators, used principally on the longer toll lines. All of these are made of ordinary soda-lime glass. 

The insulators required for carrier-current circuits need to have special electrical properties to keep down power losses in the circuits they serve. In these circuits, now bearing currents of frequencies up to about 30,000 cycles per second, there is a substantial power loss at the insulators due to absorption by the glass as well as to the leakage over the surfaces. In fact, where ordinary soda-lime glass insulators are used on high-frequency carrier-current circuits, the losses in the insulators form a large part of the total losses, particularly in wet weather. Accordingly, carrier-current insulators made of a special "low loss" glass are used as extensively as possible. These insulators are styled by double initials, such as CS, CW, or CM. The initial "C" denotes carrier-current application; "S denotes their intended use on steel pins, "W" on wooden pins, and "M" in mid-span installations. 


Above, carrier-current insulators, of "low-loss" glass;
left to right: CS, CW, CM. Below, non-carrier-current 
insulators, of soda-lime glass; left to right: 
Toll line, DP, Exchange

Special "low loss" glass is desirable for use in making carrier-current insulators chiefly because of two properties. It is highly resistant to surface etching on prolonged exposure to the weather, and it has the favorable electrical characteristics of a low dielectric constant and a low dielectric absorption. Like all glasses, this special product is a fused non-crystalline combination of acidic constituents, primarily silica, and of alkaline ingredients, but particular choices of these two constituents and their proportions are necessary to produce glass having the desired properties. Specifically, the glass is of the borosilicate type, a type so called because the acidic ingredients are a combination of boron oxide and silicon oxide (silica). In this respect it differs from the ordinary lead, soda-lime, and soda. lead glasses, which employ silica as the only important acidic element and are distinguished by the alkali used -- lead oxides, or combinations among lead oxide, soda and lime. Ordinary green glass is a soda-lime glass, owing its green color to accidental impurities of iron in the sand (silica) used in its manufacture.

The high resistance of "low loss" glass to etching in service is accountable to its high content of boron and silicon oxides and its correspondingly low content of alkalies. The latter are chiefly oxides of light metals, as sodium or potassium rather than lead or calcium. This kind of chemical composition also gives the glass a low dielectric constant and relatively low dielectric absorption. A low dielectric constant in glass is fairly closely associated with a high silica or acidic content. The phase-angle characteristics of glasses, which taken together with the dielectric constant measure the dielectric absorption, are less clearly predictable from the composition of the glass. Compositions of glass have been experimentally made, however, which are almost as favorable as fused silica in dielectric absorption and dielectric constant. These special compositions cannot be used advantageously at present in the manufacture of telephone insulators because of their greater cost or lesser adaptability to molding.

Several design features contribute materially to the realization of low power losses in carrier-current insulators. Enlarging the wire-groove diameter in relation to the pin diameter decreases the capacity of the insulator and thus reduces its dielectric absorption. Similarly the losses are reduced by permitting no thin spots in the glass and providing an air gap between the top of the insulator pin and the crown. It would even be desirable to have the outside of the carrier-current insulator metal-covered if this could be done without encouraging insects to nest beneath the darkened petticoats. This is because some of the capacity-currents entering the dielectric must first traverse an insulator surface and in so doing dissipate power if the surface has a high resistance. 

In spite of careful selection of materials and design of insulators, some power is lost by an alternating current passing from one wire to the other of a pair through the path formed by the insulators, pins and crossarms. This path may be regarded as made up of three condensers: two good ones in which the glass of the insulators constitutes the dielectric, and a third one which is poor because its dielectric is the wood of the crossarm. The power losses in the insulators are low because the glass has been chosen for its good dielectric properties, but there is no available way to make the wood crossarm a good dielectric. Consequently, this poor crossarm condenser is deprived of its power-absorbing effect by shunting it with a conductor interconnecting the insulator pins of a pair. In the case of the CS insulators, the steel pins on which they are mounted are directly connected by a conductor. CW insulators, intended for use on pole lines already equipped with wooden pins, are bonded by conductors which are attached to copper thimbles placed over the pins before the insulators are installed.

Insulators of all types must be shaped to insure reasonable strength, adaptability to manufacture, and the firm securing of line wires without slipping. The design of insulators to achieve strength is guided by a great deal of experience gained with insulators of different shapes and thicknesses of glass. Manufacturing experience has indicated the types of shape which are adaptable to automatic molding, and the precautions which the manufacturer must take to obviate introducing strains in the glass during fabrication. To secure firm retention of line wires in the annular side grooves, various shapes of groove have been tried; the present shape in the newer insulators approximates as nearly to rectangular indentation as manufacturing facility permits. 

Other mechanical considerations are also involved in determining methods of mounting. If the pin is too high, it is difficult to design with the required resistance to bending. The insulator must, however, be sufficiently elevated above the crossarm to obviate excessive wetting of the insulator under its petticoat by splashing from the crossarm during a rain. For types of service in which insulators are subjected to unusual stress, the threads of a steel pin must first be cushioned by a soft metal, such as lead, to prevent the insulator from breaking.

Trials, educated guesses, and more trials have been the instruments for advancing the development of insulators. The trials have for the most part concerned the performance of experimental insulators installed on outdoor test lines. For several years the American Telephone and Telegraph Company has maintained a station near Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, where experimental insulators are tested. A small wooden building shelters electrical measuring equipment with which a resident engineer measures the power losses occasioned by different insulators in all kinds of weather and keeps a record of their performance over long periods.

It is disheartening to wait upon the caprices of the weather several months or a year before learning whether a simple insulator modification has merit. Observations on insulators in service have made possible the generalization that rain and dust accumulation are the chief agencies that cause deterioration. In accordance with these findings, attention is now being given to the development of accelerated weathering methods and equipment for producing in a relatively short time effects comparable to those of long outdoor exposures.

The economic advantages of good line-insulation are found in the numerous savings it makes possible in plant investment. It may maintain a high level of signal strength, or reduce the requisite number of repeater stations. In general, the longer the telephone line, the greater the amount which can profitably be spent for insulators. But expense above a certain limit becomes unreasonable. Thus, in the present state of the art of silica manufacture, transparent fused silica could not economically be used for making insulators. Although a splendid insulator material, its cost for a long carrier-current system would be greater than that of some alternative method for securing equivalent transmission efficiency, such as using cheaper insulators and more repeater stations.

The great progress in working out and standardizing CS, CW, and other insulators for carrier-current systems has not yet closed the book on insulator material and design. As the science of insulators advances, quite different types may replace those now conventional. A carrier-current insulator, for example, which would mount directly on wooden pins, and which would not require the accessory copper shells and their bonding, would have a wide field of use. An ideal material for insulators would be a metal with low dielectric constant and low dielectric absorption. Such an insulating metal, cheap, tough, difficultly etched, and transparent, would receive a warm welcome from outside-plant engineers, if they survived the surprise of its discovery.


®Copyrighted 1930, Bell Laboratories, Incorporated. Reprinted with permission from the Bell Laboratories RECORD.



| Magazine Home | Search the Archives |